IT HAS been a frantic start to the Formula One season of 2012 and whilst the teams, mechanics and the fans have a brief break from racing, a real concern is threatening to bubble over the surface and explode over the Grand Prix scene.
After the Chinese Grand Prix in Shanghai on April 15, the sport is due to make a scheduled return to Bahrain. The race was cancelled last year as the season opener due to the Arab Uprisings. It was rescheduled two months later, then cancelled for good last year, as the teams couldn’t be certain about the safety within the country. This time around, it seems like there is support for the race to go ahead, but pressure is building on whether the sport should stay away.
Red Bull team boss Christian Horner, a prime mover in F1 not going last season sees no reason why the event shouldn’t run on the Sakhir track in 2012. He told JAonF1 last week; “F1 is a sport at the end of the day and we’ve always enjoyed racing in Bahrain, its on the calendar and the FIA and promoters deem it right to hold a race in Bahrain so we will be happy to be there and race.”
Despite Horner’s belief that there will be race held on April 22, protests in the region continue even a year on after the first signs of political unrest. Yesterday, Al-Jazeera reported of more protests in two towns near the circuit, which involved demonstrators being arrested and the police spraying tear gas. The protestors are also believed to be using Twitter as a useful source to get their message across. The hashtag #bloodyf1 is being used to show their displeasure. Although the trouble is nowhere near as bad as it has been in Tunisia, Egypt and most especially of late, Syria – the concern of many has to be highlighted.
F1 supremo Bernie Ecclestone is adamant that the race will go ahead, no matter what. He recently told the Press Association; “Of course the race is going to happen. No worries at all. These people were brave enough to start an event in that part of the world (2004) and that’s it. We’ll be there as long as they want us.”
Ecclestone might want the race to go ahead and the Bahrain Royal Family, prime movers in getting the region onto the calendar in 2004 might want the spectacle to run too. However, the Bahrain people still seem restless and the risks are inevitably going to be very high for spectators, the worldwide media, volunteering marshals and of course, the drivers. Is this a risk too far?
The fans seem split on opinion. Amy Jones posted on her Twitter last night; “We should axe Bahrain. While you’re at it Bernie, axe Valencia please. Thanks.
#F1. On the Planet F1 forum, sandman1347 said; “Bernie needs to realize that this partnership isn’t worth the hassle or risk. Who cares that they are willing to pay the fee to have a race there? There are at least 5 other countries who would love to have a race. Ultimately, Bernie would be wise not to enter into business arrangements with despots who torture and execute their own populace. Make a deal with someone else Bernie. Bahrain is a bad partner.” Valen on a separate forum topic disagrees; “Don’t get me wrong, I think the situation in Bahrain is terrible, but most countries in the world are having upheavel, genocide and civil war issues. Part of world politics I am afraid.”
Ultimately, the drivers and the teams should be allowed to make the final decision. It surprises me that none of the drivers, especially those who you would traditionally look to in a situation like this in Fernando Alonso and Mark Webber haven’t given their opinion yet.
For now, the Bahrain Grand Prix is expected to take place as scheduled on April 22. For me, all Bernie Ecclestone has cared about for so long is money and that has made him so successful. Formula One needs to avoid an shameful set of headlines and the worst case scenarios cannot be imagined. If the race goes ahead, I so hope there won’t be any trouble, but I can’t say that response is full of confidence. The Asian market might have the money as Europe drowns in a tidalwave of economic debt, but there are plenty of other countries who don’t have such unrest and want to stage an event. At the end of the day, commonsense needs to prevail and a decision has to be taken very quickly – safety and security is more important than an extra event.